← All Lesson Plans
Lesson Plan

The Prism

1665 to 1672, Woolsthorpe Manor in Lincolnshire and Trinity College Cambridge during and after the plague-year closure • On 24 April 2026 a team led by Wuhong Zhang and Lixiang Chen at the College of Physical Science and Technology at Xiamen University published in Advanced Photonics 'Sunlight-excited spontaneous parametric down-conversion for ghost imaging.' They used a sun-tracking heliostat and a 20-metre multimode optical fibre to feed ordinary incoherent sunlight into a periodically poled potassium titanyl phosphate (PPKTP) nonlinear crystal that split individual sunlight photons into entangled pairs. An independent team at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light and the University of Ottawa (including Robert W. Boyd) reported on arXiv that the sunlight-generated pairs violate Bell's inequality with S=2.54, comfortably above the classical bound. The sunlight Newton dispersed through a prism in 1666 turns out to also contain measurable Bell-violating quantum entanglement, free of charge, and has been arriving at Earth's surface for as long as the sun has been shining. •
Before using this lesson plan: Read the full story or listen to the 5-minute narration (works as a bell-ringer).
Quick Use (jump to the section you need)
Key Vocabulary Discussion Questions The Parallel Bell-Ringer (10 minutes) Single Class (45 minutes) Extension Activity Primary Source Connections

Overview

  • Grade Level: AP Physics 1 and 2 / AP Physics C: Mechanics and E&M / History of Science / Quantum Mechanics (grades 11-12 plus introductory undergraduate)
  • Time Required: Single class (45 minutes); bell-ringer option (10 minutes); extension (2 additional class periods)
  • Historical Period: 1665-1672, Newton at Woolsthorpe Manor and at Trinity College Cambridge; the first publication of his theory of light and colour
  • Modern Connection: The 24 April 2026 Advanced Photonics paper by Wuhong Zhang and Lixiang Chen at Xiamen University, and the simultaneous arXiv preprint from the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light and the University of Ottawa (including Robert W. Boyd), demonstrating that ordinary incoherent sunlight can drive spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a PPKTP nonlinear crystal and produce polarization-entangled photon pairs that violate Bell's inequality

Learning Objectives

Students will be able to:

  1. Describe Newton's two-prism experimentum crucis in physical terms, identify the experimental control it introduced, and explain why Newton's conclusion (that colour is an intrinsic property of sunlight) followed from the experimental result.
  1. Explain in their own words what spontaneous parametric down-conversion is, why it normally requires a laser source, and what the Xiamen 2026 experiment had to overcome to drive it with sunlight.
  1. Describe Bell's inequality in terms of the classical bound S=2, identify what it would mean for the bound to be exceeded, and summarise the historical sequence from EPR 1935 to Bell 1964 to Aspect 1981-1982 to the 2022 Nobel Prize.
  1. Construct an argument about what is and is not surprising in the result that sunlight, the same beam Newton sorted at Woolsthorpe, also produces measurable Bell-violating entanglement.

Before Reading

Anticipation Questions

  1. A 22-year-old undergraduate, sent home from university during a plague, decides to spend his time reinventing optics, calculus, and gravitation. What conditions of his life made that possible? Could it happen now?
  1. The 2026 Xiamen experiment used sunlight to drive what physicists previously believed had to be a laser-driven process. What does this kind of result tell you about how scientific assumptions get baked in over time?
  1. If a small high-school physics laboratory could in principle violate Bell's inequality with nothing but daylight and a few hundred dollars of optical components, would Bell tests still feel like a frontier experiment? Defend your answer.

Key Vocabulary

  • Prism: A transparent optical element with flat polished surfaces that refracts light, dispersing white light into its constituent colours.
  • Experimentum crucis: Latin for 'crucial experiment'. Newton's term for a single experimental setup that decisively distinguishes between two competing hypotheses.
  • Spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC): A nonlinear optical process in which a single high-energy photon entering a nonlinear crystal is split into two lower-energy photons that are quantum-mechanically entangled.
  • Nonlinear crystal: A crystal whose optical response depends non-linearly on the strength of the incoming electromagnetic field, enabling processes such as second-harmonic generation and SPDC. PPKTP (periodically poled potassium titanyl phosphate) is a standard nonlinear crystal for SPDC in the visible range.
  • Heliostat: A motorised mirror mount that tracks the position of the sun in the sky and directs reflected sunlight toward a fixed target.
  • Bell's inequality: A mathematical inequality, derived by John Stewart Bell at CERN in 1964, that places an upper bound (S=2 in the CHSH form) on the correlations between measurements of paired particles in any local-realistic theory. Quantum mechanics permits violation of the bound; experimentally observed violations rule out local-realistic theories.
  • Entanglement: A quantum-mechanical correlation between two or more particles such that the quantum state of each cannot be described independently of the others, even when separated by large distances.
  • Ghost imaging: A technique in which an image is reconstructed from the correlations between paired photons rather than from any single photon directly.

During Reading

Guided Questions

  1. Identify the precise date, place, and equipment Newton used for the experimentum crucis. What was the difference between dispersing sunlight with one prism and re-dispersing a single colour with a second prism?
  1. Describe in your own words what the Xiamen 2026 team did. Why was the sun-tracking heliostat necessary, and what did the 20-metre fibre do?
  1. The story states that 'spontaneous parametric down-conversion of sunlight had been thought practically impossible.' Why? What assumption did the 2026 experiments overturn?
  1. The Bell parameter S = 2.54 exceeds the classical threshold of 2 by approximately one quarter. Why does that specific numerical excess matter, and how does it relate to the 1981-1982 Aspect experiment that won the 2022 Nobel Prize?
  1. The story closes with the observation that 'the colour and the correlation were both already there.' What does this mean in physical terms about what was always present in the sunlight reaching Newton's prism?

After Reading

Discussion Questions

  1. Newton's prism experiment is widely taught as the founding moment of modern optics. Is it more accurate to call it the founding moment of modern experimental physics? Defend your answer with reference to the role of the second prism.
  1. (Genuinely debatable.) The story describes the 2026 result as 'something Newton could not have inferred.' Is this fair, or did Newton have all the empirical apparatus needed to ask the right questions about light and just lack the theoretical framework?
  1. The Xiamen experiment cost a small fraction of what a laser-driven Bell test would cost. What does this tell you about the role of cheap, well-characterised natural light sources in democratising experimental physics?
  1. The story emphasises that sunlight has been delivering Bell-violating correlations to Earth's surface 'for as long as the sun has been shining.' What does the assumption that those correlations were 'always there' tell you about the relationship between human experimental capability and physical reality?
  1. Robert W. Boyd, a co-author of the Max Planck and Ottawa preprint, has been working on classical and quantum optics at Ottawa for forty years. The Xiamen team is younger and at a less internationally famous physics department. What does this tell you about how breakthrough experimental physics gets distributed across institutions in 2026?

The Parallel

  1. List the structural features that are similar between Newton's 1666 prism experiment and the 2026 Xiamen sunlight-SPDC experiment. List the features that are different. Which list is longer, and which is more important?
  1. Both experiments use sunlight, both use a crystal, both produce a measurable result that distinguishes between competing theories. What kind of result does each experiment produce, and what is the relationship between the two kinds of result?
  1. Could there be an analogous 'crucial experiment' done with sunlight in a different field (chemistry, biology, climate science)? Suggest one example and defend it.

Activities

Bell-Ringer (10 minutes)

Project two images side by side: an engraving of Newton's two-prism experimental setup from the Opticks and a contemporary photograph of the Xiamen sun-tracking heliostat feeding a PPKTP crystal. Ask students: 'These two setups, three hundred and sixty years apart, both use sunlight and both use a crystal. What is each of them measuring, and what do those measurements have in common?' Have them write two sentences. Use the responses to introduce the lesson.

Single Class (45 minutes)

  • 0 to 5 minutes: Bell-ringer recap.
  • 5 to 18 minutes: Read the historical half of the story aloud. Students fill out a guided-reading organiser with three columns: 'Newton at Woolsthorpe 1665-1666,' 'The experimentum crucis,' 'The 1672 publication and reception.'
  • 18 to 32 minutes: Read the modern half aloud. Students extend the organiser with two more columns: 'Xiamen 2026 sunlight-SPDC experiment' and 'Bell-inequality violation from sunlight.'
  • 32 to 42 minutes: Whole-class four-corners discussion of After Reading question 4 (whether the correlations were 'always there'). Students physically move to a corner marked 'Realist: they were always there,' 'Operationalist: they only exist when measured,' 'Quantum-information: the question is meaningless until you define measurement,' or 'It depends on what you mean by sunlight.'
  • 42 to 45 minutes: Exit ticket. One sentence: 'The most surprising thing about the 2026 result is: ___.'

Extension Activity

Optics-history essay (3 to 5 pages, two class periods): students pick one of Newton's contemporaries (Christiaan Huygens, Robert Hooke, Ignace-Gaston Pardies, Anton van Leeuwenhoek, James Gregory) and write a structured essay describing what that person knew about light in 1672, how they reacted to Newton's letter, and how their alternative theory would have predicted or failed to predict the eventual 20th-century result that light is a quantum field. They cite at least three primary or near-primary sources.

Primary Source Connections

  • Isaac Newton, 'A Letter of Mr. Isaac Newton... containing his New Theory about Light and Colors,' Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 6 (8 July 1672), pp. 3075-3087. Type: foundational scientific paper. The first publication of Newton's optics work. Open access via the Royal Society archive.
  • Isaac Newton, 'Opticks' (London: Sam Smith and Benj. Walford, 1704). Type: monograph. Newton's mature theory of light, including the prism experiments, the corpuscular theory, and the queries.
  • Ignace-Gaston Pardies, 'Some Reflections on the Theory of Mr Newton concerning Light and Colors' (3 April 1672). Type: scientific letter, in Philosophical Transactions 6 (1672). The first published criticism of Newton's optics work.
  • J. S. Bell, 'On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox,' Physics 1.3 (1964), pp. 195-200. Type: foundational paper. The original derivation of Bell's inequality.
  • A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, 'Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers,' Physical Review Letters 49 (1982), pp. 1804-1807. Type: experimental paper. The first decisive Bell test.
  • W. Zhang and L. Chen et al., 'Sunlight-excited spontaneous parametric down-conversion for ghost imaging,' Advanced Photonics (24 April 2026). Type: peer-reviewed paper. The Xiamen sunlight-SPDC demonstration.
  • C. Li, J. Brar, M. Kublbock, J. Upham, R. W. Boyd and H. Fattahi, 'Generating quantum entanglement from sunlight,' arXiv:2602.15655 (2026). Type: arXiv preprint. The Max Planck and Ottawa team's measurement of Bell-inequality violation from sunlight.

Standards Alignment

C3 Framework

  • Dimension 1 (Developing Questions): Compelling question: 'What does it mean for two experiments three hundred and sixty years apart to ask the same question of sunlight, and what does the second answer tell us that the first could not?' Supporting questions about the role of crystals as measurement devices, the nature of incoherence, and the structure of Bell-test experiments.
  • Dimension 2 (Applying Concepts): Physics (geometric and wave optics, polarization, nonlinear optics, quantum mechanics, Bell's theorem). History (the institutional structure of seventeenth-century natural philosophy: the Royal Society, Trinity College, the Philosophical Transactions). Geography (the Stourbridge Fair as a node in the European glassmaking trade; Xiamen as a centre of contemporary Chinese photonics research).
  • Dimension 3 (Evaluating Sources): The story is accompanied by a populated evidence manifest with twelve verified claims and direct source URLs.
  • Dimension 4 (Communicating Conclusions): The structured four-corners discussion and the extension essay both require sustained argumentation and source evaluation.

AP Alignment

  • AP Physics 2: Unit 6 (Geometric and Physical Optics). Refraction, dispersion, the spectrum, polarization.
  • AP Physics C: E&M Unit 4 (Electromagnetic Waves). The classical wave theory of light, photon energy and momentum.
  • AP Physics (Quantum-mechanical extensions): Bell's theorem, entanglement, spontaneous parametric down-conversion, EPR-Bell-Aspect history.
  • AP Research / AP History of Science: A model case for tracing how a 17th-century crucial-experiment-style observation is finally re-examined in the 21st century with quantum-information tools and yields a different surprise.

About Time Rhymes Lesson Plans: Every lesson plan is generated alongside the story and aligned with the C3 Framework for Social Studies. The story itself is independently fact-checked with a full evidence manifest. All materials are free to use in the classroom.

Questions or suggestions? daily@timerhymes.com